Sunday, 30 November 2014

Web Scraping’s 2013 Review – part 1

Here we are, almost having ended another year and having the chance to analyze the aspects of the Web scraping market over the last twelve months. First of all i want to underline all the buzzwords on the tech field as published in the Yahoo’s year in review article . According to Yahoo, the most searched items wore

  •     iPhone (including 4, 5, 5s, 5c, and 6)
  •     Samsung (including Galaxy, S4, S3, Note)
  •     Siri
  •     iPad Cases
  •     Snapchat
  •     Google Glass
  •     Apple iPad
  •     BlackBerry Z10
  •     Cloud Computing

It’s easy to see that none of this terms regards in any way with the field of data mining, and they rather focus on the gadgets and apps industry, which is just one of the ways technology can evolve to. Regarding actual data mining industry there were a lot of talks about it in this year’s MIT’s Engaging Data 2013 Conference. One of the speakers Noam Chomsky gave an acid speech relating data extraction and its connection to the Big Data phenomena that is also on everyone’s lips this year. He defined a good way to see if Big Data works by following a series of few simple factors: 1. It’s the analysis, not the raw data, that counts. 2. A picture is worth a thousand words 3. Make a big data portal (Not sure if Facebook is planning on dominating in cloud services some day) 4. Use a hybrid organizational model (We’re asleep already, soon)  let’s move 5. Train employees Other interesting declaration  was given by EETimes saying, “Data science will do more for medicine in the next 10 years than biological science.” which says a lot about the volume of required extracted data.

Because we want to cover as many as possible events about data mining this article will be a two parter, so don’t forget to check our blog tomorrow when the second part of this article will come up!

Source:http://thewebminer.com/blog/2013/12/

Wednesday, 26 November 2014

Screen scrapers: To program or to purchase?

Companies today use screen scraping tools for a variety of purposes, including collecting competitive information, capturing product specs, moving data between legacy and new systems, and keeping inventory or price lists accurate.

Because of their popularity and reputation as being extremely efficient tools for quickly gathering applicable display data, screen scraping tools or browser add-ons are a dime a dozen: some free, some low cost, and some part of a larger solution. Alternatively, you can build your own if you are (or know) a programming whiz. Each tool has its potential pros and cons, however, to keep in mind as you determine which type of tool would best fit your business need.

Program-your-own screen scraper

Pros:

    Using in-house resources doesn't require additional budget

Cons:

    Properly creating scripts to automate screen scraping can take a significant amount of time initially, and continues to take time in order to maintain the process. If, for instance, objects from which you're gathering data move on a web page, the entire process will either need to be re-automated, or someone with programming acumen will have to edit the script every time there is a change.

    It's questionable whether or not this method actually saves time and resources

Free or cheap scrapers

Pros:

    Here again, budget doesn't ever enter the picture, and you can drive the process yourself.

    Some tools take care of at least some of the programming heavy lifting required to screen scrape effectively

Cons:

    Many inexpensive screen scrapers require that you get up to speed on their programming language—a time-consuming process that negates the idea of efficiency that prompted the purchase.

Screen scraping as part of a full automation solution

Pros:

    In the amount of time it takes to perform one data extraction task, you have a completely composed script that the system writes for you

    It's the easiest to use out of all of the options

    Screen scraping is only part of the package; you can leverage automation software to automate nearly any task or process including tasks in Windows, Excel automation, IT processes like uploads, backups, and integrations, and business processes like invoice processing.

    You're likely to get buy-in for other automation projects (and visibility for the efficiency you're introducing to the organization) if you pick a solution with a clear and scalable business purpose, not simply a tool to accomplish a single task.

Cons:

    This option has the highest price tag because of its comprehensive capabilities.

Looking for more information?

Here are some options to dig deeper into screen scraping, and deciding on the right tool for you:

 Watch a couple demos of what screen scraping looks like with an automation solution driving the process.

 Read our web data extraction guide for a complete overview.

 Try screen scraping today by downloading a free trial.

Source: https://www.automationanywhere.com/screen-scrapers

Saturday, 15 November 2014

Building Java Object Graph with Tour de France results – using screen scraping, java.util.Parser and assorted facilities

Last Saturday, the Tour de France 2011 departed. For people like myself, enjoying sports and working on Data Visualizations on the one hand and far fetched uses of SQL on the other, the Tour de France offers a wealth of data to work with: rankings for each stage in various categories, nationalities and teams to group by, distances and velocity, years to compare with one another and the like. So it has been my intention for some time to get hold of that data in a format I could work with.

Today I finally found some time to get it done. To locate the statistics for the Tour de France editions for the last few years and get them onto my laptop and into my database. This article describes the first part of that journey: how to get the stage results from some source on the internet into my locally running Java program in an appropriate object structure.

My starting point is the official Tour de France website:

Image

This website goes back to 2007 and also has the latest (2011) results. It presents the result in a format pleasing to the human eye – based on an HTML structure that is fairly pleasing to my groping Java code as well.

Analyzing the source of the Tour de France data

I start my explorations in Firefox, using the Firebug plugin. When I select the tab with the results for a particular stage, I inspect the (AJAX) call that is made to retrieve the stage results into the browser:

Image

The URL that was accessed is www.letour.fr/2010/TDF/LIVE/us/700/classement/ITE.html . When I access that URL directly, I see an HTML fragment with the individual ranking for the 7th stage in 2010. It turns out that with ITG instead of ITE in this URL, I get the overall ranking after the 7th Stage. Using IME in stead of ITE, I get the 7th stage’s climbers’ standing. And so on.

The HTML associated with the stage standing looks like this:

Image

Which is not as user friendly as the corresponding display in the browser:

Image

but still fairly well structured and programmatically interpretable.

Retrieving HTML fragments and parsing in Java

Consuming these HTML fragments with stage standings into my own Java code is very easy. Parsing the data and turning it into sensible Java Objects is slightly more work, but still quite feasible. From the Java Objects I next need to create a persistent storage for the data – that is the subject for another article.

Using the Java URL class and its openStream method to open an InputStream on whatever content can be found at the URL, it is dead easy to start reading the HTML from the Tour de France website into my Java program. I make use of the java.util.Scanner class to work my way through the HTML by Table Row (TR element). When you inspect the HTML fragments, it is clear early on that every individual rider’s entry corresponds with a TR element, so it seems only logical to have the Scanner break up the data by TR.

private static Stage processStage(int year, int stageSequence, Map<Integer, Rider> riders) throws java.io.IOException, java.net.MalformedURLException {

    String typeOfStanding = "ITE";
     URL stageStanding = new URL("http://www.letour.fr/"+year+"/TDF/LIVE/us/"
                                +(stageSequence==0?"0":stageSequence+"00") +
                                "/classement/"+typeOfStanding+".html");
    InputStream stream = stageStanding.openStream();
    Scanner scanner = new Scanner(stream);
    scanner.useDelimiter("</tr>");
    Stage stage = new Stage();
    stage.setSequence(stageSequence);
    boolean first = true;
    boolean firstStanding = true;
    while (scanner.hasNext()) {
        String entry = scanner.next();
        if (first) {
            first = false;
            Matcher regexMatcher = regexDistance.matcher(entry);
            if (regexMatcher.find()) {
                String distanceString = regexMatcher.group();
                stage.setTotalDistance(Float.parseFloat(distanceString.substring(0, distanceString.length() - 3)));
            }
        }
        if (!first) {
            String[] els = entry.split("/td>");
            if (els.length > 1) { // only the standing-entries have more than one td element
                Integer riderNumber = Integer.parseInt(extractValue(els[2]));

                Rider rider=null;
                if (riders.containsKey(riderNumber)) {
                    rider = riders.get(riderNumber);
                }
                else {
                    rider = new Rider(extractValue(els[1]),riderNumber, extractValue(els[3]));
                    riders.put(riderNumber,rider);
                }
                Standing standing =
                    new Standing(firstStanding ? 1 : (Integer.parseInt(extractValue(els[0]).replace(".", ""))),
                                  rider,extractValue(els[4]),
                                  extractValue(els[5]));
                firstStanding = false;
                stage.getStandings().add(standing);                }
        }
    } //while
    scanner.close();
    return stage;
}

Subsequently, the TR elements need to be broken up in the TD cell elements that contain the rank, rider’s name, their number, the team they ride for and the time for the stage as well as their lag with regard to the winner. I have used a simple split (on /td>) to extract the cells. The final logic for pulling the correct value from the cell is in the method extractValue. Note: this code is not very pretty, and I am not necessarily overly proud of it. On the other hand: it is one-time-use-only code and it is still fairly compact and easy to write and read.

private static String extractValue(String el) {
    String r = el.split("</")[0];
    if (r.lastIndexOf(">") > 0) {
        r = r.substring(r.lastIndexOf(">") + 1);
    }
    return r.split("<")[0];
}

I have created a few domain classes: Rider, Stage, Standing (as well as Tour) that are a business domain like representation of the Tour de France result data. Objects based on these classes are instantiated in the processStage method that is being invoked from the processTour method.

public static void processTour(Tour tour) throws IOException, MalformedURLException {
    if (tour.isPrologue())
      tour.getStages().add(processStage(tour.getYear(),0, tour.getRiders()));

    for (int i=1;i<= tour.getNumberOfStages();i++)  {
        tour.getStages().add(processStage(tour.getYear(),i, tour.getRiders()));
    }
}

When I run the TourManager class – a class that create a single Tour object for the Tour de France in 2010 –

public class TourManager {
     List<Tour> tours = new ArrayList<Tour>();
     public TourManager() {
        tours.add(new Tour(2010, 20, true));
        try {
            ProcessTourStandings.processTour(tours.get(0));
        } catch (MalformedURLException e) {
            System.out.println(e.getMessage());
        } catch (IOException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
     public static void main(String[] args) {
        TourManager tm = new TourManager();
        for (Tour tour : tm.getTours()) {
            for (Stage stage : tour.getStages()) {
                System.out.println("================ Stage " + stage.getSequence() + "(" + stage.getTotalDistance() +
                                   " km)");
                for (Standing standing : stage.getStandings()) {
                    if (standing.getRank() < 4) {
                        System.out.println(standing.getRank() + "." + standing.getRider().getName());
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }

it will print the top 3 in every stage:

Image

Source:http://technology.amis.nl/2011/07/04/building-java-object-graph-with-tour-de-france-results-using-screen-scraping-java-util-parser-and-assorted-facilities/

Monday, 10 November 2014

My Experience in Choosing a Web Scraping Service

Recently I decided to outsource a web scraping project to another company. I typed “web scraping service” in Google, chose six services from the first two search result pages and sent the project specifications to all of them to get quotes. Eventually I decided to go another way and did not order the services, but my experience may be useful for others who want to entrust web scraping jobs to third party services.

If you are interested in price comparisons only and not ready to read the whole story just scroll down.

A list of web scraping services I sent my project to:

    www.datahen.com - Canadian web scraping service with nice web design
    webdata-scraping.com - Indian service by Keval Kothari
    www.iwebscraping.com - India based web scraping company (same as www.3idatascraping.com)
    scrapinghub.com - A scraping service founded by creators of Scrapy
    web-scraper.com - Yet another web scraping service
    grepsr.com - A scraping service that we already reviewed two years ago


Sending the request

All the services except scrapinghub.com have quite simple forms for the description of the project requirements. Basically, you just need to give your contact details and a project description in any form. Some of them are pretty (like datahen.com), some of them are more ascetic (like web-scraper.com), but all of them allow you to send your requirements to developers.

Scrapinghub.com has a quite long form, but most of the fields are optional and all the questions are quite natural. If you really know what you need, then it won’t be hard to answer all of them; moreover they rather help you to describe your need in detail.

Note, that in the context of the project I didn’t make a request for a scraper itself. I asked to receive data on a weekly basis only.

Getting responses

Since I sent my request on Sunday it would have been ok not to receive responses the same day, but I got the first response in 3 hrs! It was from web-scraper.com and stated that this project will cost me $250 monthly. Simple and clear. Thank you, Thang!

Right after that, I received the second response. This time it was Keval from webdata-scraping.com. He had some questions regarding the project. Then after two days he wrote me that it would be hard to scrape some of my data with the software he uses, and that he will try to use a custom scraper. After that he disappeared… ((

Then on Monday I received Cost & ETAT details from datahen.com. It looked quite professional and contained not only price, but also time estimation. They were ready to create such a scraper in 3-4 days for $249 and then maintain it for just $65/month.

On the same day I received a quote from iwebscraping.com. It was $60 per week. Everything is fine, but I’d like to mention that it wasn’t the last letter from them. After I replied to them (right after receiving the quote), I received a reminder letter from them every other day for about a week. So be ready for aggressive marketing if you ask them for a quote )).

Finally in two days after requesting a quote I got a response from scrapinghub.com. Paul Tremberth wrote me that they were ready to build a scraper for $1200 and then maintain it for $300/month.

It is interesting that I have never received an answer from grepsr.com! Two years ago it was the first web scraping service we faced on the web, but now they simply ignored my request! Or perhaps they didn’t receive it somehow? Anyway I had no time for investigation.

So what?

Let us put everything together. Out of six web scraping  services I received four quotes with the following prices:

Service     Setup fee     Monthly fee

web-scraper.com     -     $250
datahen.com     $249     $65
iwebscraping.com     -     $240
scrapinghub.com     $1200     $300


From this table you can see that  scrapinghub.com appears to be the most expensive service among those compared.

EDIT: These $300/month gives you as much support and development needed to fix a 5M multi-site web crawler, for example. If you need a cheaper solution you can use their Autoscraping tool, which is free, and would have costed around $2/month to crawl at my requested rates.

The average cost of monthly scraping is about $250, but from a long term perspective datahen.com may save you money due to their low monthly fee.

That’s it! If I had enough money available it would be interesting to compare all these services in operation and provide you a more complete report, but this is all I have for now.

If you have anything to share about your experience in using similar services, please contribute to this post by commenting on it below. Cheers!

Source: http://scraping.pro/choosing-web-scraping-service/

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Web Scraping: The Invaluable Decision Making Tool

Business decisions are mandatory in any company. They reflect and directly influence about the future of the company. It is important to realize that decisions must be made in any business situation. The generation of new ideas calls for new actions. This in turn calls for decisions. Decisions can only be made when there is adequate information or data regarding the problem and the cause of action to be taken. Web scraping offers the best opportunity in getting the required information that will enable the management make a wise and sound decision.

Therefore web scraping is an important part in generation of the practical interpretations for the business decision making process. Since businesses take many courses of actions the following areas call for adequate web scraping in order to make outstanding decisions.

1. Suppliers. Whether you are running an offline business there is need to get information regarding your suppliers. In this case there are two situations. The first situation is about your current suppliers and the second situation is about the possibility of acquiring new suppliers. By web scraping you has the opportunity to gather about your suppliers. You need to know other business they are supplying to and the kind of discounts and prices they offer to them. Another important aspect about consumers is to determine the periods when they have surplus and therefore be able to determine the purchasing prices.

Web scraping can provide new information concerning new suppliers. This will make a cutting edge in the purchasing sector. You can get new suppliers that have reasonable prices. This will go a long way in ensuring a profitable business. Therefore web scraping is an integral process that should be taken first before making a vital decision concerning suppliers.

Source:http://www.loginworks.com/blogs/web-scraping-blogs/web-scraping-invaluable-decision-making-tool/